IBR Mailinglist

This is the web-interface for the IBR mailinglist - to post to the list you have to create a new forum topic --> http://ibr-beta.cpsr.org/node/add/forum/1 NOTE: YOU CAN NOT SIMPLY REPLY TO A THREAD - IT HAS TO BE A NEW POST (see above) - we recommend you to subscribe to the "real" mailing list @ http://mailman.ipjustice.org/pipermail/bill-of-rights/ - you can find the archive with all the posts before this interface was enabled (and the new posts) at http://mailman.ipjustice.org/pipermail/bill-of-rights/

Web interface out of date

 Please note that this web interface is out of date, and does not capture the recent work of the IRP coalition.  We are working to rectify this situation.  In the meantime, please join our mailing list to keep up to date and participate.  

[IRP] irp website hacked

hi everybody

unfortunatley our website has been hacked - not sure what has happened, but everything is available and ready for you at http://ibr-beta.cpsr.org/

best
max


--

"The future is here. It’s just not widely distributed yet."
—William Gibson

...........................................................................

Max Senges
Berlin

www.maxsenges.com

Mobile: 01622122755

[IRP] appologies - input - multistakholderism & a telco meeting?

Dear Meryem, Milton, Ronald and all

I understand that all three of you are veterans in this discourse; I also see that there are many traps to avoid and that I have (like everybody) much to learn.

What I do not understand is why the German example I choose is not an interesting starting point for a discussion about what means would be useful to maximise freedom of expression while providing institutions that allow to mitigate and resolve complaints?

[IRP] Proposal for IRP Charter Revision

Deal IRPlers

please find a suggestion on planning for the Charter review process attached and copied below

Best
Max

---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: Meryem Marzouki <Meryem.Marzouki@lip6.fr>
Date: Mon, Dec 14, 2009 at 1:25 PM
Subject: Proposal for IRP Charter Revision

[IRP] quite questionable decisions in the domain dispute court

Hi IRPlers
just received the following post:

Hi we met during the icann meeting in mexico, and as i recall you were interested in registrants rights.
That is why i write you: in denmark we have had some quite questionable decisions in the domain dispute court.

Some private registrants have lost their domain with no reason other than a company wanted it.

The disputecourt favored the company and some of us quite afraid that this will be the future here.

here is a link with an explanation.

[IRP] Tentative proposal for merging the APC/IRP and FCForumcharter processes

Re: [IRP] Tentative proposal for merging the APC/IRP and FCForumcharter processes
Hi all
 
I think it would be great to get as many people involvd in the Charter process as possible, and that the idea of merging with the FCForum charte

[IRP] Fwd: [A2k] OXFORD'S GLOBAL ECONOMIC GOVERNANCE PROGRAMME LAUNCHES EXPERT TASKFORCE ON GLOBAL KNOWLEDGE GOVERNANCE

[IRP] The Digital Daily Feed: Google’s Not the Competition, It’s the Environment in Which You Compete



http://digitaldaily.allthingsd.com/20091209/hitwise-nov-search-stats/

The Digital Daily Feed

November Search Stats: Google’s Not the Competition, It’s the
Environment in Which You Compete

by John Paczkowski
Posted on December 9, 2009 at 12:07 PM PT

November search metrics are beginning to roll in and they’re pretty

[IRP] Google chief: only miscreants worry about net privacy

In reply to this email, here it is a wonderful quote from Stavros Lambridinis, EU MEP (Greece)
at the closing remarks of the Madrid Privacy Meeting.

"if you have nothing to hide, then you don't have a life: get a life!"

Here it is another paper regarding the "I've got nothing to hide" paper.