This is the web-interface for the IBR mailinglist
- to post to the list you have to create a new forum topic --> http://ibr-beta.cpsr.org/node/add/forum/1
NOTE: YOU CAN NOT SIMPLY REPLY TO A THREAD - IT HAS TO BE A NEW POST (see above)
- we recommend you to subscribe to the "real" mailing list @ http://mailman.ipjustice.org/pipermail/bill-of-rights/
- you can find the archive with all the posts before this interface was enabled (and the new posts) at http://mailman.ipjustice.org/pipermail/bill-of-rights/
Please note that this web interface is out of date, and does not capture the recent work of the IRP coalition. We are working to rectify this situation. In the meantime, please join our mailing list to keep up to date and participate.
I understand that all three of you are
veterans in this discourse; I also see that there are many traps to
avoid and that I have (like everybody) much to learn.
What I do not understand is why the German example I choose is not
an interesting starting point for a discussion about what means would
be useful to maximise freedom of expression while providing
institutions that allow to mitigate and resolve complaints?
Hi we met during the icann meeting in mexico, and as i recall you were interested in registrants rights. That is why i write you: in denmark we have had some quite questionable decisions in the domain dispute court.
Some private registrants have lost their domain with no reason other than a company wanted it.
The disputecourt favored the company and some of us quite afraid that this will be the future here.